Comprehensive Readability Assessment of Scientific Learning Resources
نویسندگان
چکیده
Readability is the measure of how easier a piece text is. assessment plays crucial role in facilitating content writers and proofreaders to receive guidance about easy or difficult In literature, classical readability, lexical measures, deep learning based model have been proposed assess readability. However, readability using machine data-intensive task, which requires reasonable-sized dataset for accurate assessment. While several datasets, indices (RI) models military agencies manuals, health documents, early educational materials, studies related computer science literature are limited. To address this gap, we contributed Computer (CS) AGREE , comprising 42,850 resources(LR). We assessed objects(LOs) pertaining domains Science (CS), (ML), software engineering (SE), natural language processing (NLP). LOs consists research papers, lecture notes Wikipedia topics list repositories CS, NLP, SE ML English Language. From statistically significant sample two annotators manually annotated LO’s difficulty established gold standard. Text was computed 14 Indices 12 measures (LM). RI were ensembled, used train The results indicate that extra tree classifier performs well on AGREE dataset, exhibiting high accuracy, F1 score, efficiency. observed there no consensus among shorter texts, but as length increases, accuracy improves. SELRD along with associated provide novel contribution field. They can be assessment, develop recommender systems, assist curriculum planning within domain Science. future, plan scale by adding more multimedia LOs. addition, would explore use methods improved
منابع مشابه
Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
OBJECTIVE To assess the readability of online tracheostomy care resources. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Academic center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS A Google search was performed for "tracheostomy care" in January 2014. The top 50 results were categorized into major versus minor websites and patient-oriented versus professional-oriented resources. These websites were evaluated wit...
متن کاملReusing Textual Resources in Educational Assessment: Adding Text Readability Metrics to Learning Metadata
Many digital libraries have identified learners as a core audience. Indeed, many of their resources can be reused in educational contexts. Nevertheless, the search criteria used for retrieving texts as a specific multimedia type are limited. They often do not include properties specific to educational contexts. Assigning LOM metadata to a theatre play or a painting is difficult, since it was no...
متن کاملInvestigating the Position of Skill Learning in the Comprehensive Scientific Map of Iran
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the qualitative and quantitative status of skills in comparison with other educational categories mentioned in the comprehensive scientific map document of Iran. This research is an applied research and it is descriptive in terms of content analysis method. . In this study, five categories of science, technology, innovation, research and skill along...
متن کاملReadability and Prestige in Scientific Journals
Hartley, Trueman and Meadows [3] contribute useful evidence on whether scientists can gain prestige by writing in a manner that is difficult to read. This has been called the bafflegab theory by some. They concluded that the evidence was not strong. This comment examines some of the conclusions from Hartley, Trueman, and Meadows (HTM) and recommends directions for further research. Comments Pos...
متن کاملQuality Assessment for Collections of Learning Resources
The paper discusses some features of the learning resource collection that supports a set of learning objectives for some course. Two characteristics, compactness and completeness, are suggested as an important component of the collection quality assessment. To measure these characteristics, each resource is represented as a point in the multidimensional metadata space, and distribution of the ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: IEEE Access
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['2169-3536']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3279360